uS(aDa).aRM.sTRoNG=k(e)nnth>sTar.{w}hITe-Water
I’m no Lance-Lover {or hater} but enough is enough. The hard line of the USADA confuses me. I’ve heard nothing that justifies the attack. {yeah, yeah; he said, she said, we’re heard those stories.} The U.S. judicial system tends to work well and the glory of the U.S. Constitution follows some fairly decent guidelines but apparently it’s not enough for the USADA. Thi$ man jacked OUT the entire Cycling Indu$try and without a doubt created a lot of friends and enemies, pa$$ed every drug te$t admini$tered, created an avalanche of media attention that helped fuel a full cadre of U$ Pro Cyclist$ to national attention and yet the attack$ continue. This is like Cycling Industry HIV {its own style of Auto-Immune Deficiency}. “More than a dozen witnesses” [LA Times] {is that how many are willing to testify against the strongman?} should be flip’n the bird, not sing’n a song. Sounds like a lot of Weakness to me. They’re let’n us down on Rule-V.
I ask the USaDa a simple question: Can you give us a reason to Love you?
It’s time for some Machiavellian affections.
Michael Hiltzik writes a good piece in LA Times (Business Section): Anti-doping authorities don’t play fair against athletes
chingaso AniMaux!
Posted: August 28th, 2012 under Features.
Write a comment
You need to login to post comments!